Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Terrorism’

Remember when everyone was heralding the Arab Spring?  It was supposed to render al-Qaeda and its affiliates obsolete because young Arabs learned a new way to address their grievances?  That seems like a distant memory, what with the Muslim Brotherhood in control in Egypt and now this news.  –AA

By Catherine Herridge

The list of suspects in the Libya terror attack now extends to a handful of suspected militants aligned with an Egyptian group known as the Jamal Network, Fox News has learned. 

A U.S. official said the Jamal Network is committed to violence to attain its political ambitions, adding they are “hard-core, violent extremists in Egypt who are trying to develop a relationship with Al Qaeda.” 

Fox News is told that there are between two- and three-dozen suspects actively being investigated at any one time in connection with the Benghazi attack. The suspect list is fluid, drawn from intelligence ranging from intercepts to witness accounts, with new names being added and dropped on a regular basis. 

The majority of the suspects were described to Fox News as “locals” who come from Libya and are followers of the group Ansar al-Shariah, which wants to establish an Islamic state with adherence to strict Shariah law. 

The additional suspects are being investigated after one Tunisian suspect, Ali Ani al-Harzi, was first arrested in Turkey — after being identified through telephone intercepts where he bragged to friends about his involvement — and transferred to Tunisian custody. There is also at least one suspect with ties to Al Qaeda in Iraq. 

The radical ties of the suspects further raises questions about the degree of planning that may have been involved in an attack initially described as “spontaneous.” 

The Jamal Network takes its name from Mohammed Jamal Abu Ahmed, who was released from an Egyptian jail during the Arab Spring and is now trying to establish himself as a leader in Jihadi circles. U.S. officials believe he established training camps in Libya, and it was in these camps that some of the fighters linked to the attack were trained. 

Read Full Post »

NBC 4 New York has learned that federal authorities have arrested a man they say was plotting to attack the Federal Reserve building in Lower Manhattan, just blocks from the World Trade Center site.

The man is in custody in New York. Sources tell NBC 4 New York that the suspect, Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, lives in Jamaica, Queens.

Nafis, 21, was arrested Wednesday morning after he drove a van that he believed to be loaded with explosives from Long Island to Lower Manhattan. The man left the van near the Federal Reserve building and was then arrested by the FBI and NYPD.

Law enforcement officials stress that the plot was a sting operation monitored by the FBI and NYPD and the public was never at risk.  The explosives had been rendered inoperable, officials said.

“Two of the defendant’s ‘accomplices’ were actually an FBI source and an FBI undercover agent,” said FBI Acting Assistant Director Mary Galligan.

Sources say the suspect was acting alone in the plot against the Fed, which is located at 33 Liberty St., three and 1/2 blocks from ground zero.

He is expected in court later Wednesday.

“Attempting to destroy a landmark building and kill or maim untold numbers of innocent bystanders is about as serious as the imagination can conjure, “Galligan said. “The defendant faces appropriately severe consequences.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read Full Post »

USA TODAY

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) — Five Guantanamo prisoners charged in the Sept. 11 attacks returned before a military tribunal Monday, forgoing the protest that turned their last appearance into an unruly 13-hour spectacle.

But the apparent cooperation of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who has said he masterminded the worst terror attack on U.S. soil, and four codefendants did little to speed up proceedings that have stuck in a legal and political morass for years.

Prosecutors and lawyers spent hours arguing the most preliminary of issues, including whether the defendants have to be in court at all, with one attorney saying the hearings may dredge up bad memories of their harsh treatment in CIA detention.

“Our clients may believe that … I don’t want to be subjected to this procedure that transports me here, brings up memories, brings up emotions of things that happened to me,” said Jim Harrington, who represents Ramzi Binalshibh, accused of helping to provide support to the hijackers who crashed planes into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001.

The five men sat quietly at the defense tables under the watchful eyes of military guards and several 9/11 family members at the U.S. base in Cuba. Mohammed, his beard dyed a rust color with henna, serenely read legal papers. Two others responded politely to the judge when asked.

All seemed to cooperate with their attorneys in a specially designed high-tech courtroom that allows the government to muffle sounds so spectators behind a glass wall cannot hear classified information.

The orderly scene was in stark contrast to their arraignment in May on charges that include terrorism and murder. At that session, one prisoner was briefly restrained for acting out, Binalshibh launched into an incoherent rant, the men generally ignored the judge and refused to use the court translation system, and two stood up to pray at one point.

Harrington told the court that the defendants may want to boycott future court sessions because they don’t recognize the U.S. government’s authority, or because their transportation from their high-security cells may remind them of the harsh treatment they endured when confined in the CIA’s overseas network of secret prisons before they came to Guantanamo in September 2006.

Prosecutors want the men to be required to attend court sessions. The military judge, Army Col. James Pohl, is weighing several options, including allowing them to skip months of pretrial sessions but requiring their presence at the trial. He had not ruled on the issue before the court adjourned Monday for lunch and a prayer break.

Pohl is presiding over a weeklong hearing to consider about two dozen preliminary legal issues. An eventual trial is likely at least a year away.

The focus of the week’s hearings include broad security rules for the prisoners, including measures to prevent the accused from publicly revealing what happened to them in the CIA prisons.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read Full Post »

 European court clears way for terror suspect's extradition to U.S.

European court clears way for terror suspect’s extradition to U.S.

A European court on Monday ruled that radical Muslim cleric Abu Hamza can be extradited from Great Britain to the United States, where he faces a host of terrorism charges.

The European Human Rights Court issued its ruling, clearing the way for Hamza’s extradition. This means that he can now be moved to the United States, though no date has been set.

Hamza faces 11 charges in U.S. courts, including conspiracy in connection with a 1998 kidnapping of 16 Westerners in Yemen and conspiring with others to establish an Islamic jihad training camp in rural Oregon in 1999.

Read Full Post »

From GerardDirect

al Qaeda-led Rebels Capture Assad Missiles

By Ilana Freedman – September 10, 2012

_______________________________________________________________________________

For many weeks, leaders in the West have been openly concerned about the possibility of Syria’s large stores of chemical and biological weapons falling into the wrong hands. There is considerable disagreement, however, about what constitutes the “wrong hands”, since the West is openly embracing the “opposition forces” and the Syrian Free Army (SFA), which are increasingly dominated by al Qaeda and the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.

According to a Reuters report at the end of July, the SFA has received dozens of surface-to-air missiles (MANPADS), transported to them through Turkey, whose government supports the rebels. There is alarming photographic and video evidence that the rebels also captured a Syrian arms depot in Damascus, and acquired an unknown quantity of missiles, a development largely ignored by the Western media. ArabNews.com reported the seizure, and the event was caught on amateur video (watch the video at the bottom of our Home Page here), which shows the rebels celebrating around the captured missile containers, amid shouts of “Allah hu Akhbar!” (Allah is great!)

Since the rebel forces are now largely controlled by al Qaeda and the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the looming question is how will the new supply of weapons affect the balance of power in the war in Syria, whose death toll now approaches an estimated 20,000.

No less important than the capture of the large store of Syrian missiles is the concern that the al Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood alliance may also obtain possession of Assad’s large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapon. According to a Washington Post article, dated September 6, the “Syrian arsenal contains several hundred tons of chemical weapons and precursors, including sizable quantities of battlefield-ready sarin gas, a deadly nerve agent . . . . scattered among as many as 20 sites throughout the country”.

Is the US Supporting Terror?

How much support the US is providing to the “opposition forces” is not clear.
On August 1, Reuters reported, “President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing US support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government . . . .

“Obama’s order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence “finding,” broadly permits the CIA and other U.S. agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Assad.”

The US Treasury has confirmed that it granted authorization to the Syrian Support Group, a Washington representative of the Free Syrian Army (one of the most active rebel factions), to conduct financial transactions on the rebel group’s behalf. The authorization was first reported on Friday by Al-Monitor, a Middle East news and commentary website.

In an article dated July 26, they reported that “OFAC letter allows for providing financial, communications and logistics support to the FSA”, which could include paying for FSA salaries and provisions, as well as “communications equipment, satellite imagery, paying for satellite imagery, logistical support for transport, which could mean everything from buying a 4×4 to supporting someone’s travel to Turkey.”

The State Department also confirmed that $25 million for “non-lethal” assistance has been set aside by the US government to support the Syrian opposition for communications equipment and other “non-lethal” support.

Not unlike our support of rebels in Libya, the US has taken the side of a force heavily infiltrated with Islamist, anti-American fighters. Washington is now overtly providing them with support in their fight against the Assad government, who will gladly take our money and other support until they succeed and do not need us anymore. Just as Libya and Egypt fell to the Islamist forces, so, with the assistance of the US, Syria is likely to fall. The end result will be that, just as happened in Libya and Egypt, with the end of Assad’s regime, Syria’s historical character as a secular nation will fall to an Islamist government that will impose Shariah law. The result of our handiwork will be that the so-called “democratic revolution” will succeed, and Syria will pass from one form of tyranny to another.

Iran, Syria’s most ardent ally, is already making contingency plans for the demise of the Assad government. Hezbollah’s leader in Lebanon, Hasan Nasrallah, has been informed by Teheran that should the Assad government fall, he is to go immediately to Teheran. Even Iran sees that its desperate efforts to prop-up the faltering Assad regime may not be enough to stop the forces of Sunni Islamist ambitions.

There is deadly irony in the fact that while the Taliban continues to kill our soldiers in Afghanistan, we are providing support their ideological brothers-in-arms in Syria. In the US conduct of its foreign policy, is it really acceptable to support one evil against another?

Read Full Post »

Madrid

Spanish authorities have arrested three suspected Al Qaeda militants who were allegedly planning an attack in “Spain and/or other European countries” and confiscated enough explosives “to destroy a bus,” Interior Minister Jorge Fernández Díaz said today in a press conference.

“It’s one of the most important international [operations] against Al Qaeda,” Mr. Fernández Díaz said. “According to the information from allied intelligence services that are helping in this operation, I can confirm that there are clear indications that these people were planning” a terrorist attack, he said.

Western security officials have grown more concerned about the terrorist threat posed by so-called lone wolves – people who have sympathies with Al Qaeda but act alone or as a small cell, without direction from an organizational authority. Intelligence services suspect there are dozens of such militants in Europe. They are harder to trace or identify than organized groups, as they usually remain inoperative for years.

Read Full Post »

pkg-robertson-al-qaeda-documents-combined.cnn

Another must-see report on terrorism from CNN’s best reporter, Nic Robertston- AA

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read Full Post »

Picked up The Hunt for KSM on my kindle yesterday and couldn’t put it down.  Halfway through it already and am looking forward to what’s still to come…Highly Recommended.  – AA

Read Full Post »

By RICHARD CLARKE, JUDITH MILLER AND R.P. EDDY

Should a police department identify and engage those citizens most likely to be involved with terrorism? Should police understand the historic and current ties of certain communities to militant groups that export violent extremism? The current debate over the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism surveillance reflects fundamental disagreements over such issues.

Start with a given: The threat of terrorism is no excuse to run roughshod over civil liberties. The leeway given New York’s police in combating terrorism is spelled out in the “Handschu Guidelines,” federal court-sanctioned rules in force since 1985 and amended in 2002.

NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly says he has followed these guidelines to the letter, but since last summer a series of Associated Press articles has accused the NYPD of “wholesale surveillance of places where Muslims eat, shop, work and pray”—spying that ostensibly violates their civil rights. Now U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has asked the Justice Department to review the NYPD program.

Yet NYPD efforts to engage with and selectively surveil at-risk populations are not only legal but essential. In 2002, Mr. Kelly decided that a “broad base of knowledge” about who lives in the New York area was crucial to preventing terrorism. “It was precisely our failure to understand the context in 1993″—after the first World Trade Center bombing—”that left us vulnerable in 2001,” he said.  So police tried to determine “how individuals seeking to do harm might communicate or conceal themselves. Where might they go to find resources or evade the law?” Such “geographically-based knowledge” saved “precious time in stopping fast-moving plots,” he said last weekend.

Identifying such “hot spots” was legal, appropriate—and no secret: NYPD officials testified publicly before Congress about their work. The Handschu guidelines authorize the police to “visit any place and attend any event that is open to the public” and “conduct online search activity and to access online sites and forums on the same terms . . . as members of the public.”

Criminals often share ethnic backgrounds. For police to look for certain criminals among certain ethnic groups is only logical, and it doesn’t suggest a belief that all, or even a significant minority, of that group are criminals. Cops look for Cosa Nostra members in Italian communities, for Yakuza criminals among Japanese, for Triad criminals among Chinese. To look for al Qaeda members in Muslim communities is not to disparage such communities. Indeed many Muslims help law enforcement identify such potential threats.

What about the NYPD’s six-month surveillance of college campuses in the New York area and the Northeast Corridor, in particular of the Muslim Students Association (MSA), which has come under fire?

In 2006, police had ample cause to fear that chapters of the MSA, founded in the U.S. by the militant Muslim Brotherhood, might unwittingly host terrorists or serve as recruiting grounds. “Some of the most dangerous Western al Qaeda linked or inspired terrorists since 9/11 were radicalized or recruited at universities in Muslim Student Associations,” said NYPD Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne.

Anwar al-Awlaki, the former head of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula who was killed in a U.S. drone strike last year, was president of the MSA at Colorado State University. Umar Abdulmutallab, the al Qaeda “underwear” bomber who tried blowing up a jet over Detroit in 2009, headed the MSA at the University College of London.

The NYPD asserts, contrary to Associated Press claims, that it surveilled MSA members only after finding signs of terrorist-related activity in the course of other investigations, not from open sources. Leads from those investigations, Mr. Kelly says, triggered preliminary inquiries and, if needed, full-blown investigations using undercover police.

Another misplaced criticism is that the NYPD received assistance from the CIA, thus blurring the line “between foreign and domestic spying,” as the AP put it. The architect of the NYPD’s intelligence program was CIA vet David Cohen, and the CIA seconded Larry Sanchez to work with Mr. Cohen after 9/11. But this interaction not only has been widely reported for years—it is precisely the kind of expertise-sharing that the 9/11 Commission so strongly urged.

The CIA is rightly precluded from spying on Americans on U.S. soil, but the 1947 National Security Act (as amended) authorizes it to assist local law enforcement “when lives are endangered.” That’s not a loophole—it’s necessary cooperation as terrorism threatens cities.

NYPD Communications Division van #4018 at Hera...

NYPD Communications Division van #4018 at Herald Square. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Though it’s far from perfect, the NYPD should be praised for helping foil 14 terrorist plots targeting New York City, all while protecting our civil liberties.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read Full Post »

America faces a growing threat from “hundreds” of agents of Hezbollah in the U.S as tensions grow over Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program, current and former law enforcement officials warned the House Committee on Homeland Security on Wednesday.

Opening hearings in Washington on the domestic security threat posed by the Iranian-supported terror group, committee chairman Peter King, Republican of New York, called Hezbollah “one of international terrorism’s most violent murder gangs” and said that the government had a duty to “prepare for the worst.”

The director of intelligence analysis for the New York Police Department and former officials of the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Treasury Department who had worked intimately on Federal cases involving Hezbollah agreed that the militant Shiite group now posed a greater threat to Americans at home than Al Qaeda, Sunni Muslim militants, and that more needed to be done to identify operatives and limit their operations here.

They also agreed that a foiled Hezbollah plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the U.S. by bombing a restaurant in Washington last October was a “game-changer” suggesting that the group would not hesitate to strike on American soil if necessary by transforming what has previously been operations focused mainly on fund-raising into terror plots.

The committee was told that the more than 20 federal cases involving the Lebanese-based Hezbollah since 9/11 was probably just the tip of the iceberg of the group’s presence in the U.S., since the Federal government had chosen to quietly deport many other alleged operatives and settle other cases with publicly identifying suspected agents involved. Mr. King added that Iran has often used its diplomats to spy on American targets and support fund-raising and terror-related actions of its agents. “There also are 55 Iranian diplomats at the United Nations mission in New York and another 29 Iranian officials here at its interests section, many of whom, Mr. King said, are “presumed to be intelligence officers.”

But Bennie Thompson, of Mississippi, the ranking Democrat on the committee, questioned whether the testimony being presented was based on “outdated” information and intelligence. “No current federal officials” had been asked to testify Wednesday, he complained.

But Mitchell D. Silber, of the NYPD, disclosed the existence of three more recent cases in which Federal authorities appeared to have taken no action against alleged spies. Iranian diplomats had been “released without incident” in May, 2005, September, 2008, and September, 2010 after the NYPD had caught ostensible diplomats or employees of the Iran Broadcasting Company taking photos and video-tapes of such potential targets as cruise liners, railroad tracks inside Grand Central Station, and most recently, the Wall Street heliport.

Silber added that over the past six months, the NYPD’s investigation into terrorist plots with a “plausible nexus to Iran” that were conducted or foiled in Azerbaijan, India, Georgia, Thailand, and in Washington had “heightened our concerns” about a possible attack by Iran in New York.
Christopher Swecker, a former FBI assistant director in charge of the Criminal Investigative Division, called Hezbollah the “A Team” of terrorist organizations, given its history, its organizational reach, para-military training, and the state sponsorship of Iran. He described a landmark money-laundering case that the Bureau launched in 1998 showing how Hezbollah had leveraged the “full range of criminal activities” to raise money for the group. In March, 2001, he said, an indictment named 25 defendants in a 77 count federal bill of indictment that included such crimes as cigarette smuggling, interstate transport of stolen property, immigration, bank, mail and credit card fraud, and conspiracy to provide material support for a terrorist organization.

Michael A Braun, a former assistant administrator and chief of operations of the DEA, warned of Iran’s “growing presence in the Western Hemisphere and beyond” and the growing nexus between networks used by Mexican drug cartels and terrorist groups, especially Hezbollah. “If anyone thinks for one moment that these terrorist organizations do not understand that the Mexican drug trafficking cartels now dominate drug trafficking in our country, reportedly in more than 250 cities, then they are ignorant or very naïve,” Dr. Braun said.

He also warned that another terrorist group heavily involved in drug trading, the Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, had financed the construction of mini-submarine-like boats, one of which had carried 8 tons of cocaine from the shores of Colombia to northern Mexico. More had to be done, he said, to break down barriers that still separate counternarcotics and counterterrorism activities.

Matthew Levitt, a former senior Treasury Department official now at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said that while Hezbollah once saw America mainly as a “cash cow” to finance its sprawling activities in Lebanon where it operates openly as a powerful political faction and throughout the world, it was “no longer clear” that Iran saw carrying out an attack in the U.S. “as crossing some sort of red line.” He said that

Hezbollah specialized in recruiting agents whom it used as sleeper agents, often for years without activating them. Its agents, he added, often “don’t fit the profile,” which made the organization a more potent terrorist threat.
Levitt and other witnesses cited testimony last January by James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, that Iran’s leaders are “more willing to conduct an attack inside the United States in response to real or perceived U.S. actions that threaten the regime.”

All the witnesses agreed there was no certainty that Iran would strike in the U.S. if tensions over the nuclear program escalated or if Israel or the U.S. launched a military attack against its nuclear facilities. Nor could they link any specific surveillance incident in New York to an actual plot. But, Mr. Silber added, “Iran has a proven record of using its official presence in a foreign city to coordinate attacks, which are then carried out by Hezbollah agents from abroad, often leveraging the local community — whether wittingly or not — as facilitators.”

Intelligence officials blame Hezbollah for more American deaths than any group except Al Qaeda. Its attacks on the U.S. Marine’s peace-keeping compound in Beirut in 1983 and on Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996 had claimed some 150 deaths alone. It had staged far-flung successful attacks – two in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994 against Jewish and Israeli targets.

“If Iran had it way,” said Mr. King, “Washington D.C. would have witnessed terrible carnage amid the smoking ruins of a popular local restaurant only a few months ago,” referring to the thwarted attack on Adel Al –Jubeir, the Saudi ambassador.

Mr. King used Mr. Silber’s presence at the hearings to praise the NYPD as the nation’s most effective counter-terrorism force, and to attack press and other critics of the department’s Muslim surveillance program as “irresponsible,” “misguided” and “cheap.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers